[OSM-talk] no-go-areas

[stevea]

I've certainly tagged plenty of natural=cliff (and I'm not done yet), there's lots of them around me.  So perhaps hazard=chasm could deprecate as one value of the proposed key hazard, deferring to natural=cliff.

Still, there are plenty of objective, not-going-away-soon, not-politically-sensitive hazards on Earth.  We should map and render them, but to do so, we might resurrect a more-modern version of the hazard tag proposal.  Or anything else that would do the job.  These do seem like good, smart things to map.

Good dialog, thank you everybody.

SteveA

> On Dec 31, 2019, at 10:59 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com> wrote:
> 
> 31 Dec 2019, 19:35 by steveaOSM at softworkers.com:
> Really? Actual, real-life hazards like [chasm
> natural=cliff?