[OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers
nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk
Sat Jun 1 11:58:39 UTC 2019
Yes, that sounds a good idea.
So (and asking everyone) if I was to license the panos themselves under CC-SA, but their locations, and data derived from them, as ODBL - does that sound acceptable?
From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
Sent: 01 June 2019 08:25
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Kathleen Lu; Milo van der Linden; OSM Talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers
sent from a phone
On 31. May 2019, at 22:13, Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk<mailto:nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hello Kathleen and Milo,
No-one besides myself has uploaded anything yet, so happy to change to ODbL. The panoramas are a different dataset to OSM however, now I think about it, it could well be they are a 'derived work' as the OSM map helps users to position them - so fine with the license change.
maybe you can make use of 2 licenses, cc-by-sa for the images/panoramas and odbl for data derived from these images? ODbL is a db license and isn’t very suitable for individual photographs?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk