[OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application for hikers

Kathleen Lu kathleen.lu at mapbox.com
Mon Jun 3 17:03:50 UTC 2019


So to confirm what you want...
If someone wanted to use the panos in a video, stitched together with
photos they took and narration about a hike, that video must be CC-BY-SA or
the panos cannot be used, is that right?



On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 4:58 AM Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk>
wrote:

>
> Hello Martin,
>
>
> Yes, that sounds a good idea.
>
>
> So (and asking everyone) if I was to license the panos themselves under
> CC-SA,  but their locations, and data derived from them, as ODBL - does
> that sound acceptable?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 01 June 2019 08:25
> *To:* Nick Whitelegg
> *Cc:* Kathleen Lu; Milo van der Linden; OSM Talk
> *Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] OpenTrailView 360 - StreetView-like application
> for hikers
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 31. May 2019, at 22:13, Nick Whitelegg <nick.whitelegg at solent.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
> Hello Kathleen and Milo,
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> No-one besides myself has uploaded anything yet, so happy to change to
> ODbL. The panoramas are a different dataset to OSM however, now I think
> about it, it could well be they are a 'derived work' as the OSM map helps
> users to position them - so fine with the license change.
>
>
>
> maybe you can make use of 2 licenses, cc-by-sa for the images/panoramas
> and odbl for data derived from these images? ODbL is a db license and isn’t
> very suitable for individual photographs?
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190603/994b5dfd/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list