[OSM-talk] DJI Fly SafeGEO ZONE MAP uses OSM data... without attribution

James james2432 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 27 11:52:46 UTC 2019


on the desktop version they show ©Mapbox ©OpenStreetMap Improve this map

On Thu., Jun. 27, 2019, 7:50 a.m. Nuno Caldeira, <
nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com> wrote:

> Just an update on this, DJI now complies with the license now. they added
> the notice on the map https://www.dji.com/pt/mobile/flysafe/geo-map
>
> this only proofs that companies do take seriously a letter from the
> licensor and OSMF should take action after companies ignore the requests
> from the contributors to comply.
>
> One fixed, few others company still need to do the same.
>
> A terça, 19/03/2019, 18:48, Nuno Caldeira <nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> After more investigation noticed that the military facilities on OSM that
>> don't have name, also don't have a name on DJI also. If you search on OSM
>> the name of the facility based on DJI info they match... wonder why
>> Few users reporting that the geometry don't match in some countries (i
>> presume they simplified the geometry in polygon with X ammount of vertices)
>> or they have used other data. Compared the data from 10 EU countries and
>> they all match OSM.
>>
>> More evidence ( compare the geometries and the coordinates of the
>> vertices):
>>
>> Wrong military base name (in English)
>> OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555214494/history
>> DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/md51uwmdBUjSEtlI/www.dji.com
>>
>> Portugal
>> This Maritime Police station is wrongly tagged on OSM... is also on DJI
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444420317/history#map=19/39.42995/-9.22504&layers=N
>> DJI has it https://screenshots.firefox.com/CBdSziw1bg9Z58Fc/www.dji.com
>>
>> OTAN terminal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177395459/history
>> DJI exact same polygon
>> https://screenshots.firefox.com/LZKssfpGkmjULviX/www.dji.com
>>
>> Spain
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32635137#map=18/43.45274/-3.84917
>> DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/589CWyXHvrolF7Fy/www.dji.com
>>
>> France
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365823093
>> DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/K42sB4B5DalFx2Sr/www.dji.com
>>
>> Germany
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50156264
>> DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/LzMBa9Jx0mvidAGP/www.dji.com
>>
>> Hungary - Notice the divisions betweent the different military facilties
>> that are split...same on DJI
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116800250/history
>> DJI https://screenshots.firefox.com/vO7anIZe5EEJADcQ/www.dji.com
>>
>>
>> Às 11:42 de 19/03/2019, Nuno Caldeira escreveu:
>>
>> I don't see other data than airports in Taiwan. As I mentioned on the
>> initial, I'm talking about the military facilities and prisons, not
>> airports. China also don't have military facilities on their map, being a
>> Chinese company they probably filtered it.
>>
>> A terça, 19/03/2019, 11:28, Dennis Raylin Chen <b92612009 at gmail.com>
>> escreveu:
>>
>>> Not in Taiwan.
>>>
>>> They just use the data release by the authorities. No data from
>>> OpenStreetMap.
>>>
>>> Dennis
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:55 AM Nuno Caldeira <
>>> nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Was curious where DJI managed to get a worldwide DB of polygons of
>>>> military facilities and points of prisons, triple checked with a couple of
>>>> other users of OSM at Telegram and with polygons i added seven years ago.
>>>> Without a doubt its from OSM, the coordinates of the vertices matches OSM
>>>> perfectly. The names are also the same...
>>>>
>>>> Check yourself, head to https://www.dji.com/pt/flysafe/geo-map select
>>>> your country, zoom in and check the data. Airports restriction areas seems
>>>> not to be OSM data, but from other source.
>>>> Share your examples if you will.
>>>>
>>>> Again, sadly no attribution... tried to request via Twitter
>>>> https://twitter.com/iamnunocaldeira/status/1105897635796447235 ....
>>>> silent as in moon why would they reply to a contributor blah. The Pandora
>>>> box has been opened with exceptions about the attribution, if other don't
>>>> attribute, why would they?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> talk mailing list
>>>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190627/162fa779/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the talk mailing list