[OSM-talk] We need to have a conversation about attribution
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Mar 1 12:40:08 UTC 2019
Mar 1, 2019, 12:31 PM by simon at poole.ch:
>
>
>
> Am 01.03.2019 um 12:01 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Mar 1, 2019, 11:25 AM by >> simon at poole.ch <mailto:simon at poole.ch>>> :
>>
>>>
>>> And specifically on the issue with Mapbox customers, one of the results of the 2014 discussions was this statement by Mapbox >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847>>>> which a) states that the attribution is be default expanded, and b) that should be the case ">>> whereever possible" >>> which in our understanding>>> >>> limits the use of a default collapsed attribution to cases where it is physically impossible to show the expanded version, for example very small map snippets. In 2014 we felt that this was acceptable (we don't have an formal statement on this iirc), and I would go out on a limb and say that it would still be considered a reasonable guideline.>>>
>>>
>>>
>> This is at best outdated.
>>
>>
> We've not received any communication from Mapbox that would indicate that.
>
Well, Mapbox in their own map example is on mobile hiding attribution behind
nonobvious button so apparently Mapbox decided to not announce that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190301/2739c029/attachment.html>
More information about the talk
mailing list