[OSM-talk] We need to have a conversation about attribution

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Fri Mar 1 11:31:05 UTC 2019


Am 01.03.2019 um 12:01 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
>
>
>
> Mar 1, 2019, 11:25 AM by simon at poole.ch:
>
>     And specifically on the issue with Mapbox customers, one of the
>     results of the 2014 discussions was this statement by Mapbox
>     https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lxbarth/diary/21847 which a)
>     states that the attribution is be default expanded, and b) that
>     should be the case "/whereever possible" /which in our
>     understanding//limits the use of a default collapsed attribution
>     to cases where it is physically impossible to show the expanded
>     version, for example very small map snippets.  In 2014 we felt
>     that this was acceptable (we don't have an formal statement on
>     this iirc), and I would go out on a limb and say that it would
>     still be considered a reasonable guideline.//
>
> This is at best outdated.
>
>
We've not received any communication from Mapbox that would indicate that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190301/3ab1f16b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190301/3ab1f16b/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the talk mailing list