[OSM-talk] HTTPS all the Things (Automated Edit)

Andrew Harvey andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 26 06:04:05 UTC 2019


For example https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/68527117 changed just one
feature, there were about 20 other changes all in the same city, maybe the
script has run it's course now I don't know, it's just lots of small
changesets clog up osmcha making it harder to skip over them in bulk.

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 16:45, Bryce Jasmer <bryce at jasmer.com> wrote:

> Is this a problem that only a few are concerned with? Can I get a
> geographic area where I can run a larger number of changes in a larger
> bounding box? I could easily make some one-off changes on a per country
> basis if that would help. And would fewer changesets of, say, 100 objects
> be a good middle-of-the-road number?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:03 PM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
> wrote:
>
>> And from my side - avoid making changesets with more than 1000 objects.
>> Reverting changesets that went wrong, with tens of thousands modified
>> objects
>> is basically not making possible to review it.
>>
>> Mar 26, 2019, 12:41 AM by andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com:
>>
>> Any chance you could do more changes per changeset? At the moment this is
>> flooding feeds in osmcha with many small changesets, it would be easier if
>> you did one big changeset.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190326/01b0b0b9/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list