[OSM-talk] Documenting controversial iD decisions
jwhelan0112 at gmail.com
Tue May 28 23:53:01 UTC 2019
The problem with iD is the fact that it is the default editor on the web
page of the website which implies that everything is OpenStreetMap approved
which unfortunately is not the case.
If it's placed as the default editor then I think it needs to be held to a
higher standard or some sort of change management system implemented.
On Tue, May 28, 2019, 7:47 PM Clifford Snow, <clifford at snowandsnow.us>
> Don't you think to be fair that you should include all outside projects,
> such as JOSM, Potlatch, CartoCSS, etc? None of them are controlled by OSMF
> as far as I know. To just look at one software project seems like we
> already reached a decision, we just need the data to back it up.
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 3:47 PM Michael Reichert <osm-ml at michreichert.de>
>> I started documenting controversial decisions by the maintainers of iD
>> at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Controversial_Decisions
>> Currently, only the highway=footway and the nonsquare=yes issue are
>> Please feel free to add other issues which have proofed controversial so
>> far. Don't forget to summarise the opinion of the maintainer as well to
>> aim at least some neutrality as far as it is possible for those involved
>> in the disputes. Please add links to relevant discussions as well.
>> Best regards
>> Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
>> I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk