[OSM-talk] Documenting controversial iD decisions

[Yves]

To avoid hurting any sensibilities, I'd say this is maybe not the best way to go in its form.
Why not organizing a kind of audit with a review process that would be coordinated? 
Otherwise I fear this page could just end up being a list for everybody pet rant. 
Yves 


Le 29 mai 2019 00:46:42 GMT+02:00, Michael Reichert <osm-ml at michreichert.de> a écrit :
>Hi,
>
>I started documenting controversial decisions by the maintainers of iD
>at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Controversial_Decisions
>
>Currently, only the highway=footway and the nonsquare=yes issue are
>mentioned.
>
>Please feel free to add other issues which have proofed controversial
>so
>far. Don't forget to summarise the opinion of the maintainer as well to
>aim at least some neutrality as far as it is possible for those
>involved
>in the disputes. Please add links to relevant discussions as well.
>
>Best regards
>
>Michael
>
>
>-- 
>Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten
>ausgenommen)
>I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20190529/ef321d14/attachment-0001.html>