[OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Bombing, AT&T building, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru
80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru
Sun Dec 27 17:14:26 UTC 2020
https://goo.gl/maps/JDYpWMi1Uw6h2wpu9
>On Sun, Dec 27, 2020, 10:39 AM Steve Friedl < steve at unixwiz.net > wrote:
>>This is nonsense; the building in Nashville has a HUGE AT&T logo on it , so this is no kind of secret.
>>
>>If somebody on the ground can tell it’s an AT&T building, it should be tagged as an AT&T building.
>>
>>From: 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk < talk at openstreetmap.org >
>>Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 7:33 AM
>>To: Talk-us at openstreetmap.org ; Tagging at openstreetmap.org ; legal-talk at openstreetmap.org ; talk at openstreetmap.org
>>Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Bombing, AT&T building, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
>>
>>because nobody knows where there at, like a military base, unless you live in the area.
>>and now there under guard.
>>
>>>Sunday, December 27, 2020 9:01 AM -06:00 from Steve Friedl < steve at unixwiz.net >:
>>>
>>>The building is still there, and why would we untag ALL AT&T buldings?
>>>
>>Do we have the responsibility to un-tag, delete all AT&T building.
>>>
>>>From: 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk < talk at openstreetmap.org >
>>>Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:23 AM
>>>To: talk at openstreetmap.org ; Talk-us at openstreetmap.org ; Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>>Subject: [OSM-talk] Bombing, AT&T building, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
>>>Importance: High
>>>
>>>Do we have the responsibility to un-tag, delete all AT&T building.
>>_______________________________________________
>>Talk-us mailing list
>>Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
>>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>ry mapping service, not just OSM. Hence, definitely not an example of why a corporation's buildings covered in logos would be something to remove.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20201227/b9b3baf7/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the talk
mailing list