[OSM-talk] Attribution guideline update

[Simon Poole]

I believe there is actually a small issue with the definition here, as
there are two conflicting DIP definitions in use (one pixel on mobile
devices ~160 DPI vs one pixel for CSS 96 DPI), we need to state what we
are using.

Simon

Am 19.02.2020 um 17:22 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> Il giorno 19 feb 2020, alle ore 16:37, Michal Migurski <mike at teczno.com> ha scritto:
>>
>> For our purposes, this is a better definition because it’s defined in terms of what a viewer can see rather than its implementation in hardware.
>
> contrary to what I had written above I agree that the requirement/definition should be based on css-pixels because actual pixels are hard to know/control (if you design a website you cannot control/forsee the devices that people use to look at it, you base your layout on these theoretical css-pixels). 
> But I stick to the comment that 500px are far too many (=1000 actual retina pixels or 1500 px on a retina at 3). 200px seems perfectly ok for rendering a readable attribution string and still having some space left. There is no technical problem with lack of space for 200px wide maps.
>
> Cheers Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200219/65a20eba/attachment.sig>