[OSM-talk] Teaching cyclists how to contribute to OSM

James james2432 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 20 10:10:03 UTC 2020


I find the path way of tagging like Germany & Italy more accurate, because
MUPs aren't favouring anyone, they are paths that can accomodate cyclists,
pedestrians equally and bikes are limited to 20km/h on MUPs as they are not
segregated from pedestrians

On Mon., Jan. 20, 2020, 4:46 a.m. Alessandro Sarretta, <
alessandro.sarretta at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 20/01/20 10:16, Maarten Deen wrote:
> > Normal practice in Germany is to make all shared cycle/footpaths
> > highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated with an optional
> > segregated=yes/no.
>
> same situation in Italy (or, at least, in the area where I'm living:
> Padova and Veneto).
>
> Ale
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200120/43350922/attachment.htm>


More information about the talk mailing list