[OSM-talk] Teaching cyclists how to contribute to OSM

Maarten Deen mdeen at xs4all.nl
Mon Jan 20 10:30:15 UTC 2020


On 2020-01-20 11:10, James wrote:
> I find the path way of tagging like Germany & Italy more accurate,
> because MUPs aren't favouring anyone, they are paths that can
> accomodate cyclists, pedestrians equally and bikes are limited to
> 20km/h on MUPs as they are not segregated from pedestrians

Oh, interesting to know. In which jurisdictions? And how can the cyclist 
adhere to this since the average cyclist does not have a speedometer?

Maarten

> 
> On Mon., Jan. 20, 2020, 4:46 a.m. Alessandro Sarretta,
> <alessandro.sarretta at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On 20/01/20 10:16, Maarten Deen wrote:
>>> Normal practice in Germany is to make all shared cycle/footpaths
>>> highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated with an
>> optional
>>> segregated=yes/no.
>> 
>> same situation in Italy (or, at least, in the area where I'm living:
>> 
>> Padova and Veneto).
>> 
>> Ale
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



More information about the talk mailing list