[OSM-talk] #AttributionIsNotOptional experiment on OSM France tile servers
Yves
yvecai at mailbox.org
Wed Mar 11 16:12:00 UTC 2020
If the terms of use is sufficiently clear, and a couple of warnings have been issued beforehand, then what can possibly happen?
This is a rhetorical question.
Yves
Le 11 mars 2020 16:10:55 GMT+01:00, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> a écrit :
>
>Am 11.03.2020 um 15:48 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk:
>> Mar 11, 2020, 15:37 by simon at poole.ch:
>>
>> As I wrote (conveniently ignored in the noise of the vigilante
>> rampage): "
>>
>> I guess that people were irritated by describing gentle reminder
>about
>> license requirements
>> using pejorative terms ("deface") where their applicability was
>dubious.
>Sorry, but that is exactly the appropriate term, and anything that will
>inevitably get you on the wrong end of being sued if you do it often
>enough, is not a "gentle reminder".
>>
>> The safe, I admit also the less fun, option, is to simply block
>> access after giving any required notice."
>>
>> And note that in case of OSMF-served tiles no notice is required.
>>
>I'm not sure why you feel it necessary to tell me about terms that I'm
>completely aware off (and in some cases that I actually co-wrote), the
>subject matter in this thread is not -just- about the OSMF operated
>servers, but of those of OSM-FR and others.
>
>Simon
>
>> See https://operations.osmfoundation.org/policies/tiles/
>>
>> "Clearly display license attribution." is in explicit requirements,
>> and given overloaded servers
>>
>> "should any users or patterns of usage nevertheless cause problems to
>> the service, access may still be blocked without prior notice."
>>
>> applies anyway.
>>
>> "access may be withdrawn at any point" is later repeated.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> talk mailing list
>> talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200311/ffe97552/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the talk
mailing list