[OSM-talk] Proposed new status for tags in the wiki: "import" for undiscussed tags that were only used by an import

[Warin]

The one I am thinking of comes from HOT activity. There is no link to an 
import proposal, they just use 'any tag they like' .. and leave it there 
undocumented.

On 17/3/20 8:59 pm, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi all
>
> My 2cts : "in use" status and statuslink to the import proposal would 
> be enough, right?
> Point is to determine where does the tag come from, and it's done by 
> statuslink, not status which reflect the current state of use.
>
> All the best
>
> François
>
> Le mar. 17 mars 2020 à 10:55, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com 
> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>
>     On 17/3/20 8:22 pm, Marc M. wrote:
>>     Hello Joseph,
>>
>>     it may give the impression that this is the way it should be done.
>>     I agree to identify these "Noise" or poor quality tags, but with a
>>     keyword to show that it's a problem. e.g. status=bad, disputed, error, ...
>>     it would be necessary to find a word that is not as strong as error,
>>     but which nevertheless clearly indicates that this is not an example to
>>     follow.
>>
>
>     Agree with both.
>
>     Possible values?
>
>     obsolete
>
>     abandoned
>
>     discarded
>
>       <https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/forsaken>
>
>     archaic
>
>     passe
>
>     stale
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200317/9ad9a06a/attachment-0001.htm>