[OSM-talk] Proposed new status for tags in the wiki: "import" for undiscussed tags that were only used by an import

[Colin Smale]

"unmaintained"? 

On 17 March 2020 10:52:39 CET, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 17/3/20 8:22 pm, Marc M. wrote:
>> Hello Joseph,
>>
>> it may give the impression that this is the way it should be done.
>> I agree to identify these "Noise" or poor quality tags, but with a
>> keyword to show that it's a problem. e.g. status=bad, disputed,
>error, ...
>> it would be necessary to find a word that is not as strong as error,
>> but which nevertheless clearly indicates that this is not an example
>to
>> follow.
>>
>
>Agree with both.
>
>Possible values?
>
>obsolete
>
>abandoned
>
>discarded
>
><https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/forsaken>
>
>archaic
>
>passe
>
>stale
>
>
>
><https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english-thesaurus/forsaken>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200317/63dbcfd8/attachment.htm>