[OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution
Yves
yvecai at mailbox.org
Sat May 2 14:54:19 UTC 2020
Le 2 mai 2020 16:21:33 GMT+02:00, "Rory McCann (OSMF Board)" <rory.mccann at osmfoundation.org> a écrit :
>On 02.05.20 14:01, Yves wrote:
>> Could somebody enlight me about the new Attribution Guidelines
>process?
>> How it is envisioned to adopt the document that is currently worked
>> upon? A vote, a decision for the board, or else?
>
>The OSMF Board to vote on it/something, making it “The Attribution
>Guidelines of the OSM Foundation”.
>
>Rory
IMHO, a a/b/c/d kind of vote like for the last Article of Association change would be preferable to really have a more representative idea of the contributor feelings. Could the OSMF set up such a process?
Some of the attributions cases are certainly simple enough to obtain a momentum, while others (multiple sources, small maps,...) are more complicated and could be subject to another round.
Yves
More information about the talk
mailing list