[OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

[Mario Frasca]

On 02/05/2020 09:54, Yves wrote:
> IMHO, a a/b/c/d kind of vote like for the last Article of Association change would be preferable to really have a more representative idea of the contributor feelings. Could the OSMF set up such a process?

only related to the voting method, what method is used currently?  when 
you offer more than two options, and you want to choose one, there's 
criteria to consider, and "first past the post" is a bad strategy.

if you like reading things in latin, there's the original literature 
/Ars notandi/, /Ars eleccionis/, and /Alia ars eleccionis/ by 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramon_Llull/
/

I think this is a very clear example: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method#Example:_Voting_on_the_location_of_Tennessee's_capital

and otherwise a more detailed description here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method (this is used by Debian).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200502/bd6eb1d9/attachment.htm>