[OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

[Yves]

I was thinking of a, b, c,... as different use cases of attribution. 

Le 2 mai 2020 17:35:47 GMT+02:00, Mario Frasca <mario at anche.no> a écrit :
>On 02/05/2020 09:54, Yves wrote:
>> IMHO, a a/b/c/d kind of vote like for the last Article of Association
>change would be preferable to really have a more representative idea of
>the contributor feelings. Could the OSMF set up such a process?
>
>only related to the voting method, what method is used currently?  when
>
>you offer more than two options, and you want to choose one, there's 
>criteria to consider, and "first past the post" is a bad strategy.
>
>if you like reading things in latin, there's the original literature 
>/Ars notandi/, /Ars eleccionis/, and /Alia ars eleccionis/ by 
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramon_Llull/
>/
>
>I think this is a very clear example: 
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condorcet_method#Example:_Voting_on_the_location_of_Tennessee's_capital
>
>and otherwise a more detailed description here:
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_method (this is used by Debian).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20200502/772adc98/attachment.htm>