[OSM-talk] Bridge area construction
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Tue May 5 23:32:01 UTC 2020
On 6/5/20 8:41 am, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 6. May 2020, at 00:08, Pierre Béland <pierzenh at yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>
>> I dont think that it is appropriate to superpose a landuse over a
>> waterway.
>
>
> this is a good point, but you could spare the waterway out and just
> tag the construction site on the land. Depending on the details,
> bridge span and kind of construction, this can lead to good
> (temporary) representations or also be inadequate.
Devils advocate hat on:
Water is simply a land cover. So landuse is fine over water. In fact it
is used for landuse=aquaculture.
>
>
>>
>> Since the tag man_made=bridge is used, it seems better to refer to
>> the construction project with the tags as proposed by Jack Armstrong
>>
>> - man_made=construction
>> - construction=bridge
>> - layer=1
>
>
> there are only 40 man_made=construction in the whole world:
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=construction
>
> the tag sounds reasonable, but it isn’t really done this way.
Yet according to the wiki a bridge is normally tagged man_made=bridge,
so it is logical to deduct that a bridge under construction should be
man_made=construction
construction=bridge
layer=1
-------------------------- Use?
Less than 10% of landuse=construction have construction=*
There are one 3 landuse=bridge.
There are over 86,000 man_made=bridge.
More information about the talk
mailing list