[OSM-talk] Suggested mass edits

Martin Machyna machyna at gmail.com
Mon Apr 19 22:14:04 UTC 2021


Just following up on this. I ran it on all changesets and the winner is 
definitely JOSM

JOSM/1.5 29952
iD 2948
Potlatch 1820
Vespucci 243
Go 112
Merkaartor 98
reverter;JOSM/1.5 59
osmtools/30252 12
FixTypo7 4
Globe 2
ID 2
Sun 1
Osmose 1
egeotechindia 1
By 1
Holzer 1
osmapis/0.9.3 1
GNU 1
PushPin 1
osm-mechedit-fix-addr 1
osm2go 1


On 18.4.21 6:34 , Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another usual caveat is:
>
> If these buggy objects appear in clusters, they might hint at a deeper 
> problem. Are many of them created by the same user(s) or by the same 
> editor(s)? If that is the case, more research might be appropriate so 
> that editors or workflows can be improved. Sometimes analysis of the 
> broken data can also point to a broken import or mass edit that has so 
> far been undetected and will, upon closer look, have more problems 
> than just these obvious ones. In such a situation, simply deleting the 
> buggy objects will remove the "red flags" that would otherwise have 
> pointed at the broken import or mass edits.
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>



More information about the talk mailing list