[OSM-talk] Suggested mass edits

pangoSE pangose at riseup.net
Tue Apr 20 08:31:09 UTC 2021


Interesting.  Could you open a ticket on the JOSM bugtracker about this?

Martin Machyna <machyna at gmail.com> skrev: (20 april 2021 00:14:04 CEST)
>Just following up on this. I ran it on all changesets and the winner is
>
>definitely JOSM
>
>JOSM/1.5 29952
>iD 2948
>Potlatch 1820
>Vespucci 243
>Go 112
>Merkaartor 98
>reverter;JOSM/1.5 59
>osmtools/30252 12
>FixTypo7 4
>Globe 2
>ID 2
>Sun 1
>Osmose 1
>egeotechindia 1
>By 1
>Holzer 1
>osmapis/0.9.3 1
>GNU 1
>PushPin 1
>osm-mechedit-fix-addr 1
>osm2go 1
>
>
>On 18.4.21 6:34 , Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Another usual caveat is:
>>
>> If these buggy objects appear in clusters, they might hint at a
>deeper 
>> problem. Are many of them created by the same user(s) or by the same 
>> editor(s)? If that is the case, more research might be appropriate so
>
>> that editors or workflows can be improved. Sometimes analysis of the 
>> broken data can also point to a broken import or mass edit that has
>so 
>> far been undetected and will, upon closer look, have more problems 
>> than just these obvious ones. In such a situation, simply deleting
>the 
>> buggy objects will remove the "red flags" that would otherwise have 
>> pointed at the broken import or mass edits.
>>
>> Bye
>> Frederik
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>talk mailing list
>talk at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20210420/d34d9658/attachment.htm>


More information about the talk mailing list