[OSM-talk] Cyclosm - new map layer at OSM website, congratulations!

[Ewen Hill]

Splendide et chapeau Christian!
   I have just completed a detailed update of a 100km trail and found this
rendering made it far more intuitive and even the bike tools icon renders
well and camping works a treat.  The only one very minor item is that being
in a vast country, it would be nice to still have a couple of the key
icons, mainly water at above zoom level 15 /14 and that shelters could be
included as well. E.G.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8320594613#map=18/-34.90262/117.26458&layers=Y
is great if you know it is there but not so great if you are looking at the
entire route for places to stay.

Once again - thank you!

Regards

Ewen

On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 09:40, Mateusz Konieczny via talk <
talk at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> It sounds like new style works well - as always visualizing/using something
> reveals plenty of mistakes in data :)
>
> Jan 14, 2021, 23:05 by jwhelan0112 at gmail.com:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/45.4642/-75.4871&layers=Y
>
> Look at tenth line road, blue dotted line.
>
> I stand corrected someone has tagged it as having a cycle lane eight years
> ago.  The person hasn't mapped for more than a year, isn't local and I
> suspect looked at the sidewalk from a satellite image which has an asphalt
> strip between it and the highway on one side.   There is a cycle lane at
> the junction of Innes road but it terminates where the highway narrows.
> The asphalt strip has curbs at both ends and is not the smoothest to ride
> on so I suspect it counts as sidewalk.
>
> The sidewalks in Ottawa are pedestrian only, which is a city bylaw, and
> there are plans to add in cycle lanes on tenth line at some point in time.
>
> Thanks for getting me to peer at it or I wouldn't have spotted it.
>
> Cheerio John
>
>
>
>
> Mateusz Konieczny via talk <talk at openstreetmap.org>
> 14 January 2021 16:28
> Can you link OSM way that is affected by
> "Some 60 km/hr highways without a cycling lane have a blue dotted path" ?
>
>
> Jan 14, 2021, 17:55 by jwhelan0112 at gmail.com:
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> Mateusz Konieczny via talk <talk at openstreetmap.org>
> 14 January 2021 11:44
> It is based on OSM data, maybe cycleway data is not correctly tagged there?
>
> Jan 14, 2021, 17:42 by jwhelan0112 at gmail.com:
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
> Mateusz Konieczny via talk <talk at openstreetmap.org>
> 14 January 2021 07:01
> Congratulations to people who made this map style, host servers
> and people who handled adding it to OSM website!
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.0770/19.9333&layers=Y
>
> Potentially useful docs:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Browsing#Layers
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_tile_layers/Guidelines_for_new_tile_layers
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_tile_layers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
> --
>
> Sent from Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>


-- 
Warm Regards

Ewen Hill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20210115/48a94089/attachment-0001.htm>