[OSM-talk] Review of name and boundary tagging - revised and amended guidelines to address and resolve disputes
Brian M. Sperlongano
zelonewolf at gmail.com
Tue Jul 13 13:47:35 UTC 2021
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:38 AM Bert -Araali- Van Opstal <
bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13/07/2021 09:11, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
> Jul 12, 2021, 16:17 by bert.araali.afritastic at gmail.com:
> C. if the above fail to reach a consensus, what is the fall back scenario.
> Do we define a reference framework, like the UN or others ?
> Definite no to putting "regulations from the UN" above actual situation.
> I agree, it is not what I said as to be proposed. I said resolutions from
> the UN are fall back reference frames when the OSM community fails to reach
> a consensus using our own guidelines framework.
I do not think that this is a workable solution. There are many cases
where a local community is not in agreement with international
organizations, and this would effectively be choosing a winner based on
fiat rather than doing the more difficult but necessary work of achieving a
compromise that all sides can live with.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the talk