[OSM-talk] Mechanical Edit?

Brian M. Sperlongano zelonewolf at gmail.com
Sun Jul 25 19:24:06 UTC 2021


I object to reverting this changeset.  If the changes are wrong, that's
another story, but so far the complaint seems to be entirely that you don't
like the mapper's methods.  Creating another global bbox seems like a weird
fix for the complaint of another mapper creating bounding boxes that are
too large.

On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 2:41 PM Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 10:19 AM Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> yes, any form of editing that could (theoretically) make you "fix" a
>> totally implausible object (e.g. a house in the ocean) is a mechanical
>> edit.
>>
>> Especially, anyone on a mission to eradicate "deprecated" tags should be
>> viewed with suspicion.
>>
> Thanks Frederik.
>
> Does anyone have any objection to me reverting this changeset?
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20210725/0af622b4/attachment.htm>


More information about the talk mailing list