[OSM-talk] Request to share survey of user participation in OSM
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Aug 25 21:08:18 UTC 2022
Aug 25, 2022, 20:48 by social at rodrigo.digital:
>
>
> On 25/8/22 10:11, Marc_marc wrote:
>
>> for example they continue to be done on closed platforms, which de
>> facto irritates some participants or even leads them not to answer,
>> thus biasing the results (the less open-minded will not be affected
>> by this criterion, the more strict on the use of open will potentially be absent)
>>
>
> What are the possible solutions to this issue?
>
Research involving survey gets better.
I would not expect it, most of such things are either
protoscience or pseudoscience, and done by students
with insufficient resources and shoestring budget.
At least in this case it was not mass-send spam send
via PM or to private email addresses, so was already above
average of surveys I get.
It is not responsibility of OSMF to do this, and we have many
higher-importance things to handle.
If such platform would be maintained by OSMF it should be used
for internal surveys only.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20220825/c09a40c9/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the talk
mailing list