[OSM-talk] An open letter to OSMF board members.
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Jun 1 19:45:39 UTC 2022
Jun 1, 2022, 20:53 by davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com:
> On 01/06/2022 12:43, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I am one of OSM Carto maintainers, almost inactive. Out of some reasons why I am inactive:
>>
>> I implemented most of what I wanted and could improve
>>
>
> So, "following your own agenda" by implementing "pet-projects".
>
If you feel that for example displaying bus stop names is a mistake, then feel free
to request removal as unwanted pet feature.
Or implement PR removing it.
The same goes for other changes that I made.
If I would be implementing my pet features then we would have display
of leisure=hackerspace, contraflow lanes and prominent marking of invalid
uses of name tag and marking that wikipedia tags should use secondary linking
like brand:wikipedia.
There is difference between "I care about it and I am willing to spend several
hours on it" and "pet feature" and I am mostly able to notice difference.
Displaying amenity=bicycle_parking was closest to promoting pet project.
> your lack of comprehension
Seriously, continuing this will just make harder to get people willing to expose to
that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20220601/dd54cfee/attachment.htm>
More information about the talk
mailing list