[OSM-talk] Andy Townsend is above local community?

[Mateusz Konieczny]

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121943595 has no changeset
comments

you mention local decisions but do not link them

Before accusing people on public mailing list and bothering
all subscribers - can you try using changeset comments?

Or at least provide citation for all your main claims?

Also, for example I see no indicator of "with his DWG hat on"

Also, it seems to be fixing isolated bridge with highway=secondary
within highway=tertiary. 

If I understand it right then it seems a clearly correct edit,
and if it violates some tagging idea then such tagging ideas are
badly designed and should be modified to stop requiring such
fragmentation.

Jun 4, 2022, 19:36 by tomasstraupis at gmail.com:

> Hello
>
>  Can somebody explain to me, how did we come to a situation where
> Andy Townsend is knowingly breaking decision of the local community?
>
>  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121943595
>
>  Mapping of Lithuanian official road classification to OSM road
> classes was agreed by Lithuanian community years ago, it was later
> revised, classification changed (db updated) according to new schema.
> Decision was not my alone (part of discussion was on talk-lt list),
> re-tagging to new schema was also not done by me (which also indicates
> that it was not my personal decision).
>
>  While I understand, that some aspects of this schema might be in
> question for people not in local community, but we had some very good
> reasons to do so. And in my understanding it is a decision of local
> community how we map. Andy Townsend having never been on the spot,
> having never spoken to local community, having no understanding of
> region should not be above local community. Andy claims he have red
> local rules which state very clearly how things should be mapped, but
> he made what he calls "interpretation" and mapped differently, knowing
> that it contradicts local decision.
>
>  Has an official rule that OSMF does not dictate how we map was
> dropped recently?
>
> Note: this mail is not about the tagging decision itself (we can
> discuss it in a separate thread), but about Andy with his DWG hat on
> knowingly breaking it.
>
> -- 
> Tomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> talk mailing list
> talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20220604/a5f35450/attachment.htm>