[OSM-talk] New moderation team & etiquette guidelines for talk@ & osmf-talk@ list

[Simon Poole]

I'm asking for clarification because the wording is extremely far 
reaching and not limited to the cases which we probably all agree are 
not acceptable (and are all ready ruled out by the OSMF ToS), that is 
identifying somebody against their wishes, profiling and so on.

'Posting information that could identify another person'

Am 09.06.2022 um 16:58 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/9/22 10:18, Simon Poole wrote:
>> Could the board clarify if linking to changesets is considered doxing 
>> or not?
>
> Discussing the work of other mappers is a fundamental part of our 
> community QA process. Obviously trying to limit that would be harmful 
> to the goals of the project as a whole and hence linking to changesets 
> is of course fine. I don't think that this requires a reply from the 
> moderation team - if their reply were "uh you can't do that" then they 
> would need to be replaced immediately for incompetence ;)
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20220609/d2caa4c5/attachment.sig>