[OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Jan 6 13:34:59 UTC 2023




Jan 6, 2023, 11:50 by valinora at gmx.net:

> To sum up: Coordinates can be used in the same wrong way as OSM id as
> they're both not sufficient enough for the use case most people are
> using it (indirectly).
>
But coordinates can be used correctly (shop updating their location
when their location moves).

It is impossible to guarantee it with OSM ids (in theory they could check
OSM object daily to check whether its id changed but that would be absurd)

> There is no visible reason to me why adding another unstable
> identifier like the osm id is a bad idea.
>
Coordinates are stable, information attached to coordinates can become
outdated (shop relocated, landmass moved etc) but coordinate itself is stable.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20230106/6e122719/attachment.htm>


More information about the talk mailing list