[OSM-talk] Survey about OSM communication behaviors

[Courtney]

Yes, I understand the concern and am in the middle of adding clarification
to the introduction to all 23 copies of the survey.

C

On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 9:25 PM Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 4:58 PM Courtney <courtney.williamson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Here, too, we gave quite a bit of careful thought to the decision. We
>> felt that if we did not disclose that we were on the CWG, that it might be
>> seen by some as a lapse of transparency.
>>
> It is good that you disclosed your affiliations.  However, you also need
> to make it abundantly clear that this project is not part of your work for
> the CWG (and for those of you employed by TomTom, not part of your
> employment). Otherwise, you are potentially misleading people to believe,
> as I did, that this was an official CWG survey.  I am assuming that you had
> the best of intentions and that you were not trying to mislead anyone.
>
> As Frederick pointed out, members of some other working groups seem to do
> a very good job of making it clear as to whether they are speaking as part
> of a WG or as an individual.
>
> Mike
>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20230501/5f60c2d5/attachment-0001.htm>