[Tile-serving] [osm2pgsql] Disable ORDER BY way "clustering" (#102)
Paul Norman
notifications at github.com
Wed Nov 13 20:39:37 UTC 2013
Testing indicates that a modified pinning number is no better with
ORDER BY way than by clustered/ordered on osm_id. As the table at
this point are approximately ordered by ID, skip ordering completely.
The modified pinning number is the pinning number, but instead of a
point, an area equivalent to a rendering meta-tile.
For high zooms and a true pinning number ordering by ID is effective,
probably because typically the ways right around a point were created
at about the same time.
For low zooms, a clustering on gist (way) may be desirable, but this
is something the user will have to consider, particularly as it takes
a decent amount of time to do this clustering, and significantly
increases the disk space requirements during the import process.
Benchmarks show the pinning number is within 10% for both a full planet and an extract and the ID-ordered z12 modified pinning number is 50% of the `ORDER BY way` z12 modified pinning number for the line table and 90% for the polygon table.
@apmon, I know there's some conflicts between this and the threading branch, but this also completely eliminates a section you had to change, making the merge simpler.
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/pnorman/osm2pgsql no_ordering
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/pull/102
-- Commit Summary --
* Disable ORDER BY way "clustering"
-- File Changes --
M output-pgsql.c (10)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/pull/102.patch
https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/pull/102.diff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tile-serving/attachments/20131113/34715d00/attachment.html>
More information about the Tile-serving
mailing list