[Tilesathome] Disabling old lowzoom?
Dirk-Lüder Kreie
osm-list at deelkar.net
Mon Apr 7 00:12:38 BST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Juergen Buchner schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> is there any consensus which lowzoom method should be used? I think
> mixing both methods results in "ugly" maps. Even in areas which are
> rendered with the new method, sometime "old style" tiles are rendered
> by some users.
>
> So, if everybody should use the "new lowzoom", wouldn't it be a good
> idea to disable the "old lowzoom"?
Due to limitations of the t at h client-server communication it's not as
easy as it might sound. The only reliable way would be to look up the
info (metadata) of offending tiles and contacting the t at h user responsible.
- --
Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFH+VjmFUbODdpRVDwRAg2aAJ9CadLgsjkbwuz9lSVYmpPYRH6JugCfcVIP
zb3n9ITayTpMmpATPhm39Y0=
=fguk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3743 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/attachments/20080407/cb54d49f/attachment.bin>
More information about the Tilesathome
mailing list