[Tilesathome] Bug in code for batik=2

[Dirk-Lüder Kreie]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jiri Klement schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> Inkscape is still faster for me, even with your java tweaks. Inkscape
> 8m, batik -client 12m, batik -server 18m.
> 
> Anyway, if batik can run reasonably fast even in interpretted mode,
> then it may outperform inkscape running with -server flag. But it
> would require to change genTiles.pl to render all zoom levels in one
> batik invocation.

The main reason for Batik integration is not speed, but memory consumption.


- --

Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie
Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIIsGZFUbODdpRVDwRAqL5AKCBIS0QbW55v8hg6RGY5lL7dNJt/ACeObGx
rMnMjvaodu+RDYm5cdEFcCI=
=SUfx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3743 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/attachments/20080508/876ed89b/attachment.bin>