[Tilesathome] Two new ROMA...

[Matthias Julius]

Mathieu Arnold <mat at mat.cc> writes:

> +-le 24.11.2008 17:20:01 +0100, Mathieu Arnold a dit :
> | Hum, the beter idea is hum, to use the haproxy I configured, which spreads
> | the load between the three ROMA servers, which is the one I put in the
> | examples up there, no ?
>
> Adding to that, I'd say that with the HAProxy in front of the ROMA servers,
> it should be able to work reliably.
> The ROMA servers should then be put at the begining of the servers list, so
> that t at h clients ask them most of the time, and fall back on XAPI or API only
> if all the ROMA servers in the proxy are down.

True, this could be another approach.  I guess the HAProxy queries
another ROMA server if the first one returns an error.  But if one of
the ROMA servers returns bogus data how do you find out which one it
is?

Matthias