[Tilesathome] Two new ROMA...

[Mathieu Arnold]

+-le 24.11.2008 12:20:13 -0500, Matthias Julius a dit :
| Mathieu Arnold <mat at mat.cc> writes:
| 
|> +-le 24.11.2008 17:20:01 +0100, Mathieu Arnold a dit :
|> | Hum, the beter idea is hum, to use the haproxy I configured, which
|> | spreads the load between the three ROMA servers, which is the one I put
|> | in the examples up there, no ?
|> 
|> Adding to that, I'd say that with the HAProxy in front of the ROMA servers,
|> it should be able to work reliably.
|> The ROMA servers should then be put at the begining of the servers list, so
|> that t at h clients ask them most of the time, and fall back on XAPI or API
|> only if all the ROMA servers in the proxy are down.
| 
| True, this could be another approach.  I guess the HAProxy queries
| another ROMA server if the first one returns an error.

That is also my guess.

| But if one of
| the ROMA servers returns bogus data how do you find out which one it
| is?

Well, I have the logs, I can point fingers :-)

-- 
Mathieu Arnold