[Tilesathome] exception using batik on z16

Knut Arne Bjørndal bob+osm at cakebox.net
Sun Feb 1 13:49:21 GMT 2009


On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:46:51PM +0100, Henrik Niehaus wrote:
> Henrik Niehaus schrieb:
> > Knut Arne Bjørndal schrieb:
> >> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:46:57AM +0100, Henrik Niehaus wrote:
> >>> Knut Arne Bjørndal schrieb:
> >>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:44:56PM +0100, Stephan wrote:
> >>>>> type (namespace: http://www.w3.org/2000/svg, name: flowRoot).
> >>>> This is caused by the subway icon, which uses some SVG 1.2
> >>>> feature. I've had a go at rewriting it manually, but couldn't figure
> >>>> out how to get all the transforming right, and petschge (who
> >>>> originally did the icon) seems to have an inkscape that thinks this is
> >>>> such a good idea it doesn't want to write SVG 1.1.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can anybody figure out a way to get this transformed to the correct
> >>>> SVG version? There's no point in having this text flow stuff in there
> >>>> anyway since it's just one character, and I dearly hope no SVG
> >>>> processor will start dividing that into multiple lines.
> >>> I have written about this error on Januar 10th, but nobody seemed to be
> >>> interested.
> >>> I have simply changed the svg version to 1.2 in orp.pl to fix this
> >>> problem. Don't know, if this is ok, since nobody responded :-(
> >> I'm sorry you didn't get much of an answer, but as I said both I and
> >> petschge had a go at fixing this with little luck.
> >>
> >> The problem seems to be that SVG 1.2 in Batik has some extra
> >> dependencies, and it seems stupid to force 1.2 compatibility for such
> >> a stupid reason (some software might even not have 1.2 support at
> >> all).
> >>
> >> I'll have another go at messing with the SVG code now, but I'm not too
> >> optimistic about figuring it out, so if anybody else manages to
> >> convert it that would be great.
> >>
> didn't notice, that you posted a solution before. Since your new icon
> uses text instead of pathes, it looks more sophisticated to me, though
> it looks a little different than the original icon. But I think, we can
> live with that.

How is it different? I couldn't get the original icon to show in any
sensible way, so my knowledge of how it's supposed to be is very
limited...

-- 
Knut Arne Bjørndal
aka Bob Kåre
bob+osm at cakebox.net
bobkare at irc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4167 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/attachments/20090201/2f1dc0d6/attachment.bin>


More information about the Tilesathome mailing list