[Tilesathome] exception using batik on z16

[Henrik Niehaus]

Knut Arne Bjørndal schrieb:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:46:51PM +0100, Henrik Niehaus wrote:
>> Henrik Niehaus schrieb:
>>> Knut Arne Bjørndal schrieb:
>>>> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:46:57AM +0100, Henrik Niehaus wrote:
>>>>> Knut Arne Bjørndal schrieb:
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:44:56PM +0100, Stephan wrote:
>>>>>>> type (namespace: http://www.w3.org/2000/svg, name: flowRoot).
>>>>>> This is caused by the subway icon, which uses some SVG 1.2
>>>>>> feature. I've had a go at rewriting it manually, but couldn't figure
>>>>>> out how to get all the transforming right, and petschge (who
>>>>>> originally did the icon) seems to have an inkscape that thinks this is
>>>>>> such a good idea it doesn't want to write SVG 1.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can anybody figure out a way to get this transformed to the correct
>>>>>> SVG version? There's no point in having this text flow stuff in there
>>>>>> anyway since it's just one character, and I dearly hope no SVG
>>>>>> processor will start dividing that into multiple lines.
>>>>> I have written about this error on Januar 10th, but nobody seemed to be
>>>>> interested.
>>>>> I have simply changed the svg version to 1.2 in orp.pl to fix this
>>>>> problem. Don't know, if this is ok, since nobody responded :-(
>>>> I'm sorry you didn't get much of an answer, but as I said both I and
>>>> petschge had a go at fixing this with little luck.
>>>>
>>>> The problem seems to be that SVG 1.2 in Batik has some extra
>>>> dependencies, and it seems stupid to force 1.2 compatibility for such
>>>> a stupid reason (some software might even not have 1.2 support at
>>>> all).
>>>>
>>>> I'll have another go at messing with the SVG code now, but I'm not too
>>>> optimistic about figuring it out, so if anybody else manages to
>>>> convert it that would be great.
>>>>
>> didn't notice, that you posted a solution before. Since your new icon
>> uses text instead of pathes, it looks more sophisticated to me, though
>> it looks a little different than the original icon. But I think, we can
>> live with that.
> 
> How is it different? I couldn't get the original icon to show in any
> sensible way, so my knowledge of how it's supposed to be is very
> limited...
> 
> 

The S of your icon is a little bit smaller, than the original one.

http://img88.imageshack.us/my.php?image=subwayiconsja1.png (Yours is the
right one)