[OSM-dev] Consensus on areas?

[Joerg Ostertag (OSM Munich/Germany)]

On Monday 28 August 2006 11:58, Immanuel Scholz wrote:
> > Do we have a consensus (particularly w.r.t the 0.4 API) with where we are
> > going with areas? If I remember the outcome of the last discussion was to
> > stick to one type i.e. ways and then have clients render the way either
> > as a path or an area depending on the tags.
>
> Well, some sort of "consens".
>
> I still dislike this idea but nobody cares. So I don't care about areas
> anymore.

Well; i would care. ANd my preference would really be to have areas being a 
list of nodes.
This sounds to me like the apropriate datastructure for area data.

-- 
Jörg (Germany, Munich)

http://www.ostertag.name/
TeamSpeak2: ts2.ostertag.name, user: tweety, Channel: "GPS Drive"
irc://irc.oftc.net/#osm