[OSM-dev] UK Dev Day

[SteveC]

On 27 Apr 2007, at 16:58, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Nick Black wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/27/07, *Robert (Jamie) Munro* <rjmunro at arjam.net
>>> <mailto:rjmunro at arjam.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think Potlatch is a priority as such - if Rails launches  
>>> without
>>> Potlatch, we are still moving forwards overall. Potlatch can be
>>> added later.
>>
>> It can, but the applet will need an unknown amount of work to make it
>> ready for 0.4 - whilst this could be trivial, it seems like wasted
>> effort to do this and then sort out Potlatch.
>
> Surely the applet just uses the same standard API that JOSM, T at H etc.
> use and that the Rails port is backwards compatible with. If the  
> applet
> doesn't work with it, we need to fix it, not the applet.

It's not backwards compatible.

have fun,

SteveC | steve at asklater.com | http://www.asklater.com/steve/