[OSM-dev] ROMA servers down - osmosis large way problem
Stefan de Konink
stefan at konink.de
Tue Dec 30 13:05:17 GMT 2008
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> The latter still requires the same client/server modifications +
>> modifications in all current node relations. Hence it will cost more
> No it doesn't; 99.9% of all ways don't violate the new criteria so all
> tools will work perfectly for them.
The problem is the actual search for and modification of the violators.
Like the current problem with ways/relation of size 0; invalid
>> Even in 0.5 relations can be ordered using the type='...'.
> You're getting (more) ridiculous.
> What are you trying to prove here? That you're right and the rest is
> wrong? That you are a masterful programmer and the others just dumb
Matt claimed it was impossible to do order in relations within API 0.5.
That argument is wrong. That is the only thing I'm proving here. And I
did make an error because I should talked about role instead of type.
> You have meanwhile reached a point where I'd rather see the project go
> down in flames than implement a single one of your ideas. Do it yourself
> or go to hell.
I am doing it myself, don't worry. And I don't get stopped by any flames
on mailinglists :) Happy new year to you too :)
More information about the dev