[OSM-dev] disputed areas
osm at na1400.info
Sun Feb 10 12:47:21 GMT 2008
Based on the hourly Osmosis change dumps a separate Osmosis process could
compare all the edits against a bounding box or polygon of Cyprus and revert
all the changes to that area. That won't need any changes to rendering, the
API, editors etc. It can also be switched off quickly or even supplemented
with more disputed areas.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog at gmail.com>
To: "Rob Reid" <rob at robreid.co.nz>
Cc: <dev at openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 13:10
Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] disputed areas
> On Feb 10, 2008 6:15 AM, Rob Reid <rob at robreid.co.nz> wrote:
>> I worry that this might escalate the edit war, if the result of an edit
>> war in a disputed territory is that the area is removed from the map,
>> might that not encourage the person making the spurious edits to move
>> their attention into the country they are having the edit conflict with
>> in an attempt get parts of that country removed as well?
> This is beginning to get rather messy. TBH as a community not
> rendering the area in question is the only bargaining chip we have. Or
> slightly less extreme solution, drop the rendering of names. At the
> end of the day there's not much we can do against people who can't
> accept the fact that a place may have multiple names.
> It does make me wonder what they do for maps in the places themselves.
> A less drastic solution is restricting the name:xx fields you can
> edit, but that doesn't help when people actually *delete* and recreate
> the nodes.
> On a different note, if you setup a process that monitored the nodes
> in question and simply reverted any edits within five minutes of doing
> them (currently technically feasable) how long before people get tired
> of changing them?
> Have a nice day,
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog at gmail.com> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
More information about the dev