[OSM-dev] Potlatch causing DB inconsistency?

[Richard Fairhurst]

Stefan Baebler wrote:

> Any ideas what's going on?

I think it's reasonably well attested that, without transactions, this  
sort of thing is going to happen once in a while. As posted the other  
day, Potlatch's database access code has been rewritten almost beyond  
recognition for 0.10 (see http://tinyurl.com/5996mn) so there's not a  
whole lot of point filing bugs against 0.9c; let me know if you see  
anything like this happen with 0.10, of course.

cheers
Richard