[OSM-dev] Mapping during license change / "safe to edit"

Igor Brejc igor.brejc at gmail.com
Wed Aug 25 09:27:04 BST 2010

Probably not realistic, but an idea nevertheless a new Web map layer showing
all nodes, ways (relations?) in simple wireframe mode. Those that are not
"safe" shown as red and those that are in black.

But I'm a bit skeptical whether this all would do any good. I'd say go ahead
and map. And save your local copies of OSM files for the stuff you edited,
just in case.


On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>   understandably, the license change process creates some unease amongst
> mappers. Most of them are pragmatic - they have agreed to the change, and
> now they want to continue what they do best, which is mapping stuff.
> They know that mapping new stuff (without reference to incompatible
> sources) is safe, and anything they create will definitely be in OSM to
> stay.
> But some of them are wary of modifying existing objects. How can they know
> that they are not building on sand - might the very object they are about to
> edit one day have to be removed because its author has not agreed to the
> license change?
> How could we make life easier for them? What technological measures could
> realistically be employed to determine what is "safe to edit" and how could
> this be signalled to the mapper?
> Bye
> Frederik
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20100825/2d75b6fa/attachment.html>

More information about the dev mailing list