[OSM-dev] [Strategic] OSM front page discussion and user survey results (with pictures)
steve at asklater.com
Sun May 1 20:41:43 BST 2011
Is it still correct to call is OSB though? It feels like a rewrite,
integrated in to the rails_port. When you say OSB I think of .... OSB.
On 5/1/2011 12:37 PM, Kai Krueger wrote:
> Should we not move the discussion about the details of the
> OpenStreetBugs implementation from the strategic mailing list over to
> the dev list? (which I have CCed)
> It seems there is general consensus about that if technically done
> correctly, an instance of OpenStreetBugs integrated into the main page
> would be welcomed and useful, so the strategic aspect is done and we
> are now well into the implementation phase.
> On 29/04/2011 13:55, Steve Coast wrote:
>> So I played with it, it looks pretty good. My changes would be
>> relatively minor, plus some questions.
>> * Only let me enter bugs when zoomed in a fair way
>> * Don't show me all the bugs just by default on the map.
>> * I really don't believe in having to click the map again to enter a
>> bug. My mum would be confused. Just use the center point of the map. So
>> the model is, click to enter bug, popup, it says "be as descriptive as
>> possible", done. The extra click makes a lot of sense for you and me,
>> but not someone new. I know there are a ton of "but, but, but" arguments
>> against this, but really, simple is _so_ much better.
>> Now questions
>> * I'm assuming the API looks sane?
>> * I'm assuming the data is all going in to whatever rails db is talking
>> to, not some magical special other db?
>> * I'm assuming there has been some cross-browser testing?
>> * I'm assuming there is a proper db migration
>> I'm happy to take a peek at the code too and make some adjustments,
>> where is it?
>> On 4/29/2011 10:39 AM, Kai Krueger wrote:
>>> On 04/29/2011 02:56 AM, Eugene Usvitsky wrote:
>>>> * "Report an error" link to OpenStreetBugs
>>> I'd like to mention that there is a (more or less) fully functional
>>> implementation of the "Report an error" functionality at
>>> It is heavily modeled after the ideas of the original OSB (and uses
>>> fully integrated into the rails_port. Apart from having the bugs
>>> stored in the main OSM database, this also allows to hook into OSM's
>>> user management to make it easier to keep track of your own bugs and
>>> bug comments. This might make it easier to communicate between bug
>>> reporter and mapper.
>>> The Api was also slightly adopted from the original OSB API to be more
>>> in line with the other rails APIs. It is mostly a rename, though, so
>>> it shouldn't be difficult to adapt existing clients to the new API.
>>> A year ago, when I did the bulk of the coding, I talked to Mitja
>>> Kleider (the maintainer of the current OSB instance) about possible
>>> transition strategies from the external OSB instance to the integrated
>>> one once things are ready. He said it would probably be possible to
>>> use the existing URLs as a proxy to not cause any disruption for
>>> existing clients in the transition period and thus gracefully moving
>>> over without any losses.
>>> Tom has just agreed to have a look at the code and review it in the
>>> next couple of weeks, so depending on what his review sais and how
>>> much change and clean up is necessary, we might be able to see some
>>> progress on this fairly soon.
>>> If people have comments and suggestions on what can be improved, I'd
>>> be grateful for any tips. However, my priority is on getting something
>>> workable and usable actually deployed before adding too many new
>>> Strategic mailing list
>>> Strategic at openstreetmap.org
>> Strategic mailing list
>> Strategic at openstreetmap.org
More information about the dev