[OSM-dev] Improving History and Monitoring

Tom Hughes tom at compton.nu
Sat May 7 15:01:37 BST 2011

On 07/05/11 14:33, Mikel Maron wrote:

> * "big" changesets are no longer marked, but that was useful. Want to
> find some non-obtrusive way of visually distinguishing them.
> * would be nice to do a similar same thing with bots. Is there a bot
> flag in the db?

The correct solution to this is to sort out OWL integration. I have 
previously refused patches to do other heuristics and I see no reason to 
change that policy.

> * Need to set a minimum height on the map.

Fixed by me yesterday.

> * The real way to deal with big and bot changesets is to have this
> listing driving by OWL. What's needed to make that happen?

We need to sort out hardware so we can move it to a proper production 
status. We had a machine but it turned out not to have enough disk and 
now it has been temporarily borrowed for something else.

> * How could we incorporate more visualization tools directly, like
> ITOMapper?

This has to be subject to the usual caveats about not relying on 
external services on the main site.


Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)

More information about the dev mailing list