[OSM-dev] Improving History and Monitoring
tom at compton.nu
Sun May 8 00:09:07 BST 2011
On 07/05/11 19:58, Erik Johansson wrote:
> Even if OWL gets integrated I think Mikels solution would still be
> better for many changesets (and vice versa). Considering that OWL in
> its current form isn't designed to visualize lots of changesets, this
> clearly isn't only about big changesets.
I think you misunderstand - we are talking about using OWL's ability to
identify changesets which touch an area to drive the current website UI
not about using the current OWL UI.
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
More information about the dev