[OSM-dev] Improving History and Monitoring

[Tom Hughes]

On 07/05/11 19:58, Erik Johansson wrote:

> Even if OWL gets integrated I think Mikels solution would still be
> better for many changesets (and vice versa). Considering that OWL in
> its current form isn't designed to visualize lots of changesets, this
> clearly isn't only about big changesets.

I think you misunderstand - we are talking about using OWL's ability to 
identify changesets which touch an area to drive the current website UI 
not about using the current OWL UI.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/