[OSM-dev] Improving History and Monitoring
Tom Hughes
tom at compton.nu
Sun May 8 00:09:07 BST 2011
On 07/05/11 19:58, Erik Johansson wrote:
> Even if OWL gets integrated I think Mikels solution would still be
> better for many changesets (and vice versa). Considering that OWL in
> its current form isn't designed to visualize lots of changesets, this
> clearly isn't only about big changesets.
I think you misunderstand - we are talking about using OWL's ability to
identify changesets which touch an area to drive the current website UI
not about using the current OWL UI.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
More information about the dev
mailing list