[OSM-dev] Chinese spam diaries, an analysis

Tom Hughes tom at compton.nu
Thu Dec 4 12:38:47 UTC 2014

On 04/12/14 12:06, Andreas Labres wrote:
> On 04.12.14 12:33, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> So in other words, most of things we already factor in to our spam scoring...
>> We're just not quite as rigid.
> A (hidden) spam score is bad (IMO). Nobody sees it, almost nobody can test it.

Nothing is hidden:



Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)

More information about the dev mailing list