[GraphHopper] Routeing option: Walking on mixed cycle/footpath
Peter
graphhopper at gmx.de
Wed Nov 12 23:56:53 UTC 2014
Hmmh, that is a common problem: it is a cycleway and foot is not
explicitely allowed there. So strictly speaking this is correct
according to the mapping.
I understand the problem and I also found places where this was ugly for
myself. At the same time there are places where it is important to keep
walking people off this road. What we could do is allow access but make
it AVOID_AT_ALL_COSTS.
Peter.
On 11.11.2014 23:51, D KING wrote:
> We have many shared use paths in our local area, but these are only
> available within the current Graphhopper Maps implementation within
> the cycling mode. They are usually useful walking routes, often the
> only available footpath links across rivers.
>
> We have a Sustrans cycle route on the alignment of the old railway
> from Bath>Bristol, and also the riverside towpath, both of which are
> unavailable for walking routes within Graphhopper.
>
> (Correct alignment in cycling)
> https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=bike&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors
>
> (Incorrectly missing the walking possibilities)
> https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.430789%2C-2.475915&point=51.412966%2C-2.455616&point=51.390744%2C-2.422142&point=51.381853%2C-2.390213&point=51.384022%2C-2.381823&point=51.379656%2C-2.367382&point=51.378585%2C-2.363906&point=51.377647%2C-2.35086&point=51.388361%2C-2.347877&point=51.392351%2C-2.339101&point=51.396742%2C-2.316699&point=51.394011%2C-2.313566&vehicle=foot&elevation=true&layer=TF%20Outdoors
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/graphhopper/attachments/20141113/84bbcbe6/attachment.html>
More information about the GraphHopper
mailing list