[HOT] Tech WG - tasking manager - workflow branch
theodin at posteo.de
Tue Feb 4 08:13:23 UTC 2014
Maybe we could dothe process like Kort (OSM gamification
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kort_Game ) does it. There, several people must check a certain
thing and after three sucessfull checks it gets accepted into OSM. That would be like a 2-step
first other mappers validate a tile 2-3 times
second an experienced mapper validates it again blocks it and marks it as done.
But maybe this process is too much work.
Am 04.02.2014 00:38, schrieb Severin MENARD:
> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 05:46:50 -0800 (PST)
> From: Mikel Maron <mikel_maron at yahoo.com <mailto:mikel_maron at yahoo.com>>
> To: Pierre GIRAUD <pierre.giraud at gmail.com <mailto:pierre.giraud at gmail.com>>, HOT Openstreetmap
> <hot at openstreetmap.org <mailto:hot at openstreetmap.org>>
> Subject: Re: [HOT] Tech WG - tasking manager - workflow branch
> <1391435210.32961.YahooMailNeo at web161701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
> <mailto:1391435210.32961.YahooMailNeo at web161701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Thanks for the update, great to hear about the progress and new UI features.?
> So I'm clear, you're talking about
> And by v2, are we talking about this version?
> On validation, I agree it needs a rethink. There is definitely a need for validation in some
> form. But I'd hesitate to remove functionality, the current validation without replacing it
> with something else. I suggest we keep it for now, and move on discussion of what this should
> really look like.
> From my experience over the last months I would say the validation is two-folds:
> - by task to review what each contributor did. The green step would be good ONLY IF IT COULD BE
> INVALIDATED. Currently once validated, it cannot be revert and the task cannot be selected
> anymore. This is really a pain as some mappers validate tasks that are far for being done. I must
> also confess I validated one or two tasks by accident myself. Is it not possible to easily remove
> this blocking feature and make the validation reverted if needed?
> - over the whole mapped area, to harmonize the mapping and set a coherent road network. For more
> details, refer to the discussion I had on this list with Nick Allen a few weeks ago. Create a
> wikipage on this is still on my todo list.
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the HOT