[HOT] Tech WG - tasking manager - workflow branch

Theodin theodin at posteo.de
Tue Feb 4 08:13:23 UTC 2014


Another idea:

Maybe we could dothe process like Kort (OSM gamification
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kort_Game ) does it. There, several people must check a certain
thing and after three sucessfull checks it gets accepted into OSM. That would be like a 2-step
validation:
first other mappers validate a tile 2-3 times
second an experienced mapper validates it again blocks it and marks it as done.

But maybe this process is too much work.

Regards,
Theodin


Am 04.02.2014 00:38, schrieb Severin MENARD:
>
>
>     Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 05:46:50 -0800 (PST)
>     From: Mikel Maron <mikel_maron at yahoo.com <mailto:mikel_maron at yahoo.com>>
>     To: Pierre GIRAUD <pierre.giraud at gmail.com <mailto:pierre.giraud at gmail.com>>, HOT Openstreetmap
>             <hot at openstreetmap.org <mailto:hot at openstreetmap.org>>
>     Subject: Re: [HOT] Tech WG - tasking manager - workflow branch
>     Message-ID:
>             <1391435210.32961.YahooMailNeo at web161701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
>     <mailto:1391435210.32961.YahooMailNeo at web161701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>>
>     Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>     Pierre
>
>     Thanks for the update, great to hear about the progress and new UI features.?
>
>     So I'm clear, you're talking about
>     merging?https://github.com/pgiraud/osm-tasking-manager/tree/workflow
>     into?https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager
>     <https://github.com/pgiraud/osm-tasking-manager/tree/workflowinto?https://github.com/hotosm/osm-tasking-manager>
>     ?
>
>     And by v2, are we talking about this version?
>     https://github.com/pgiraud/osm-tasking-manager2
>
>
>     On validation, I agree it needs a rethink. There is definitely a need for validation in some
>     form. But I'd hesitate to remove functionality, the current validation without replacing it
>     with something else. I suggest we keep it for now, and move on discussion of what this should
>     really look like.
>
>
> From my experience over the last months I would say the validation is two-folds:
> - by task to review what each contributor did. The green step would be good ONLY IF IT COULD BE
> INVALIDATED. Currently once validated, it cannot be revert and the task cannot be selected
> anymore. This is really a pain as some mappers validate tasks that are far for being done. I must
> also confess I validated one or two tasks by accident myself. Is it not possible to easily remove
> this blocking feature and make the validation reverted if needed?
> - over the whole mapped area, to harmonize the mapping and set a coherent road network. For more
> details, refer to the discussion I had on this list with Nick Allen a few weeks ago. Create a
> wikipage on this is still on my todo list.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Severin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOT mailing list
> HOT at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/attachments/20140204/f86f3279/attachment.html>


More information about the HOT mailing list